Effect of new diagnostic criteria on detection and pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study

Authors

  • Suk-Ching YOUNG
  • Mei-Sin YIU
  • Po-Lam SO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.20.1.02

Keywords:

Blood glucose, Diabetes, gestational, Pregnancy outcome

Abstract

Introduction: To determine the effect of changes in the diagnostic criteria on the number of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detected and on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed results of the 75g oral glucose tolerance test and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of Chinese women with singleton pregnancies delivered at Tuen Mun Hospital between January and December 2016. Those with GDM was treated with lifestyle modification with or without insulin. Women with GDM detected by the old and new criteria were compared in terms of the numbers of GDM detected, maternal characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal outcomes.
Results: Of 733 pregnant women, 211 (28.8%) and 190 (25.9%) were identified as having GDM based on the old or new criteria, respectively (p=0.01). Women with GDM based on the old or new criteria were comparable in terms of maternal characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Among the 190 women with GDM based on the new criteria, 33 (17.4%) had normal fasting blood glucose and 2-hour glucose results but abnormal 1-hour glucose result. Compared with women without GDM, women with GDM detected by 1-hour glucose test alone had lower birthweight neonates (3.04 kg vs 3.22 kg, p=0.01), more neonates small for gestational age (3.7% vs 15.2%, p=0.01), with hypoglycaemia (15.2% vs 3.9%, p<0.001), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (12.1% vs 1.3%, p<0.001).
Conclusions: The new criteria detected 2.9% fewer women with GDM. 17.4% of women with GDM who were associated with poor neonatal outcomes were detected exclusively by 1-hour glucose test. The new criteria can help identify high-risk women for fetal monitoring.

References

World Health Organization. Definition and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of a WHO consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. 1999.

International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010;33:676-82.

World Health Organization. Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy. Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85975/1/WHO_NMH_MND_13.2_eng.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2019.

HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991-2002.

Guariguata L, Linnenkamp U, Beagley J, Whiting DR, Cho NH. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:176-85.

Guideline of Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by The Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Available from: www.hkcog.org.hk/hkcog/Download/Guidelines_on_GDM.pdf. Accessed 12 January 2019.

Jenum AK, Mǿrkrid K, Sletner L, et al. Impact of ethnicity on gestational diabetes identified with the WHO and the modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol 2012;166:317-24.

Ekeroma AJ, Chandran GS, McCowan L, Ansell D, Eagleton C, Kenealy T. Impact of using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria in South Auckland: prevalence, interventions and outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;55:34-41.

2016 Hong Kong Population census. Available from https://www.bycensus2016.gov.hk/en. Accessed 12 January 2019.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e1-e25.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 29: The Management of Third- and Fourth-degree Perineal Tears. London: RCOG; 2015.

Fok TF, So HK, Wong E, et al. Updated gestational age specific birth weight, crown-heel length, and head circumference of Chinese newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F229-36.

MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report. UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2016. Available from: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrraceuk/reports. Accessed 12 January 2019.

Alkalay AL, Sarnat HB, Flores-Sarnat L, Elashoff JD, Farber SJ, Simmons CF. Population meta-analysis of low plasma glucose thresholds in full-term normal newborns. Am J Perinatol 2006;23:115-9.

Koning SH, van Zanden JJ, Hoogenberg K, et al. New diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus and their impact on the number of diagnoses and pregnancy outcomes. Diabetologia 2018;61:800-9.

Laafira A, White SW, Griffin CJ, Graham D. Impact of the new IADPSG gestational diabetes diagnostic criteria on pregnancy outcomes in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2016;56:36-41.

Lapolla A, Dalfrà MG, Ragazzi E, De Cata AP, Fedele D. New International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommendations for diagnosing gestational diabetes compared with former criteria: a retrospective study on pregnancy outcome. Diabet Med 2011;28:1074-7.

Erjavec K, Poljicanin T, Matijevic R. Impact of the implementation of new WHO diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus on prevalence and perinatal outcomes: a population-based study. J Pregnancy 2016;2016:2670912.

Wong VW, Lin A, Russell H. Adopting the new World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: How the prevalence changes in a high-risk region in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017;129:148-53.

Claesson R, Ekelund M, Berntorp K. The potential impact of new diagnostic criteria on the frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:1223-6.

Basri NI, Mahdy ZA, Ahmad S, et al. The World Health Organization (WHO) versus The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their associated maternal and neonatal outcomes. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2018;34.

Yew TW, Khoo CM, Thai AC, Kale AS, Yong EL, Tai ES. The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among Asian females is lower using the new 2013 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria. Endocr Pract 2014;20:1064-9.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-06

How to Cite

1.
YOUNG S-C, YIU M-S, SO P-L. Effect of new diagnostic criteria on detection and pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective study. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 6 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];20(1). Available from: https://hkjgom.org/home/article/view/273

Issue

Section

Original Article