Cosmetic outcome of single-port versus multipleport laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.20.1.05Keywords:
Cosmetics, Gynecology, LaparoscopyAbstract
Objective: To compare single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) with multiple-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) in terms of cosmetic outcome, operating time, and length of hospital stay.
Methods: We retrospectively retrieved all SPLS cases performed in the gynaecology department at Queen Elizabeth Hospital during 2017 to 2018. Same number of matched MPLS cases performed within the same period was retrieved randomly for comparison. Patient satisfaction regarding surgical scar was assessed using the modified Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. Only the satisfaction rating was used. Score for each item ranges from 1 (least satisfied) to 4 (very satisfied).
Results: 12 patients who underwent SPLS were compared with 12 randomly selected matched patients who underwent MPLS. Both SPLS and MPLS groups scored highly for the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire. SPLS group generally scored slightly higher than MPLS group and significantly higher in items: the colour of the wound associated with surrounding tissue, the height of the scar, overall appearance, and overall symptoms from the scar. 91.7% of SPLS patients and 58.3% of MPLS patients preferred the respective techniques if given a choice.
Conclusion: Both SPLS and MPLS achieved exceptional cosmesis outcomes, but SPLS was superior to MPLS in some items. More patients may prefer SPLS if they are aware of the technology.
References
Kim MK, Kim JJ, Choi JS, Eom JM, Lee JH. Prospective comparison of single port versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015;41:590-5.
Huang BS, Wang PH, Tsai HW, Hsu TF, Yen MS, Chen YJ. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian dermoid cysts. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2014;53:523-9.
So KA, Lee JK, Song JY, et al. Tissue injuries after single-port and multiport laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: a prospective multicenter study. Exp Ther Med 2016;12:2230-6.
Wang SY, Yin L, Guan XM, Xiao BB, Zhang Y, Delgado A. Single port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal masses: a retrospective study of feasibility and safety. Chin Med J (Engl) 2016;129:1305-10.
Eom JM, Kim KH, Yuk JS, Roh SI, Lee JH. Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1850-5.
Borle FR, Mehra B, Ranjan Singh A. Comparison of cosmetic outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural Indian population: a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Surg 2015;77(Supp 3):877-80.
Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1481-9.
Far SS, Miraj S. Single-incision laparoscopy surgery: a systematic review. Electron Physician 2016;8:3088-95.
Eom JM, Ko JH, Choi JS, Hong JH, Lee JH. A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;167:104-9.
Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 2011;201:369-72.
Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P. Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2011;98:1695-702.
Gangl O, Hofer W, Tomaselli F, Sautner T, Fugger R. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC): a matched pair analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011;396:819-24.
Garg P, Thakur JD, Raina NC, Mittal G, Garg M, Gupta V. Comparison of cosmetic outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an objective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:127-30.
Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1296-303.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.