Mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for second trimester termination of pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong

Authors

  • Wai-Yan YEUNG
  • Tsz-Ching LEE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.22.2.01

Abstract

Objective: To compare the mifepristone-misoprostol regimen with the misoprostol-alone regimen in terms of safety and effectiveness in women who underwent second trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP).
Methods: Medical records of all women with singleton pregnancy who underwent MTOP during the second trimester at Queen Elizabeth Hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were reviewed. Patients were prescribed with misoprostol 400 μg every 3 hours up to a maximum of five doses per day orally or vaginally, or with mifepristone 200 mg followed by misoprostol after 36 to 48 hours. The primary outcome was the time from first misoprostol dose to fetal expulsion.
Results: Of 94 patients (mean age, 33.5 years) included, 48 received the mifepristone-misoprostol regimen and 46 received the misoprostol-alone regimen. The mean gestational age was 16 weeks 4 days. Compared with the misoprostol-alone group, the mifepristone-misoprostol group had shorter time to fetal expulsion (7.3 hours vs 11.3 hours, p=0.017), shorter time to placental expulsion (7.9 hours vs 12.2 hours, p=0.026), higher proportion of successful abortion within 10 hours (71.7% vs 43.8%, p=0.005) and 24 hours (95.7% vs 79.2%, p=0.016), and lower number (3 vs 5, p<0.001) and dosage (1200 μg vs 1600 μg, p<0.001) of misoprostol administered. Complication rate was similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: The mifepristone-misoprostol regimen is effective and safe for second trimester MTOP, with a shorter time to fetal expulsion.

References

Lee VC, Ng EH, Ho PC. Issues in second trimester induced abortion (medical/surgical methods). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010;24:517-27.

Dickinson JE, Godfrey M, Evans SF. Efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol in second-trimester pregnancy termination: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Med 1998;7:115-9.

Borgatta L, Chen AY, Vragovic O, Stubblefield PG, Magloire CA. A randomized clinical trial of the addition of laminaria to misoprostol and hypertonic saline for second-trimester induction abortion. Contraception 2005;72:358-61.

Fiala C, Gemzel-Danielsson K. Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue. Contraception 2006;74:66-86.

Goh SE, Thong KJ. Induction of second trimester abortion (12-20 weeks) with mifepristone and misoprostol: a review of 386 consecutive cases. Contraception 2006;73:516-9.

Ashok PW, Templeton A, Wagaarachchi PT, Flett GM. Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases. Contraception 2004;69:51-8.

Rose SB, Shand C, Simmons A. Mifepristone- and misoprostol-induced mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: a review of 272 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;46:479-85.

Kapp N, Borgatta L, Stubblefield P, Vragovic O, Moreno N. Mifepristone in second-trimester medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1304-10.

Ngoc NTN, Shochet T, Raghavan S, et al. Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:601-8.

Dabash R, Chelli H, Hajri S, Shochet T, Raghavan S, Winikoff B. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of mifepristone or placebo before buccal misoprostol for abortion at 14-21 weeks of pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;130:40-4.

Ho PC, Tsang SS, Ma HK. Reducing the induction to abortion interval in termination of second trimester pregnancies: a comparison of mifepristone with laminaria tent. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:648-51.

Ho PC, Ngai SW, Liu KL, Wong GC, Lee SW. Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:735-8.

World Health Organization. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2nd ed. 2012.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion: Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Number 7. London: RCOG; 2011.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Abortion Care [NG140].

Historical abortion statistics, Hong Kong. Available at: http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-hongkong.html. Accessed 12 January 2022.

Wildschut H, Both MI, Medema S, Thomee E, Wildhagen MF, Kapp N. Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;2011:CD005216.

Gemzell-Danielsson K, Lalitkumar S. Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol alone: a review of methods and management. Reprod Health Matters 2008;16(31 Suppl):162-72.

Constant D, Harries J, Malaba T, et al. Clinical outcomes and women’s experiences before and after the introduction of mifepristone into second-trimester medical abortion services in South Africa. PLoS One 2016;11:e0161843.

Monti M, Tibaldi V, Santangelo G, et al. The use of misoprostol and mifepristone in second trimester interruption of pregnancy: state of art. Clin Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med 2020;6:DOI: 10.15761/COGRM.1000280.

Nagaria T, Sirmor N. Misoprostol vs mifepristone and misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2011;61:659-62.

Hamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. Analgesia requirements and predictors of analgesia use for women undergoing medical abortion up to 22 weeks of gestation. BJOG 2004;111:996-1000.

Hamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. A randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2348-54.

Oral mifepristone 600 mg and vaginal gemeprost for midtrimester induction of abortion. An open multicenter study.

UK Multicenter Study Group. Contraception 1997;56:361-6.

Akkurt MO, Akkurt I, Yavuz A, Yalcin SE, Coskun B, Sezik M. The utility of feticide procedure to shorten the induction-to-abortion interval in medical abortion. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2019;84:64-70.

Nautiyal D, Mukherjee K, Perhar I, Banerjee N. Comparative study of misoprostol in first and second trimester abortions by oral, sublingual, and vaginal routes. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2015;65:246-50.

Bebbington MW, Kent N, Lim K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two protocols for the use of misoprostol in midtrimester pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:853-7.

Mahjabeen, Khawaja NP, Rehman R. Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for mid-trimester pregnancy termination. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009;19:359-62.

Feldman DM, Borgida AF, Rodis JF, Leo MV, Campbell WA. A randomized comparison of two regimens of misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:710-3.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-06

How to Cite

1.
YEUNG W-Y, LEE T-C. Mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for second trimester termination of pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 6 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];22(2). Available from: https://hkjgom.org/home/article/view/320

Issue

Section

Original Article