Alternative pathways to oral glucose tolerance test for Chinese pregnant women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.24.2.368Keywords:
Diabetes, gestational, Glucose tolerance test, Infection controlAbstract
Objectives: To compare the gold standard pathway of universal second-trimester oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with eight alternative pathways to determine the optimal pathway that can reduce the number of OGTTs performed but still maintains high sensitivity and specificity for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis in the Chinese population.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of pregnant women who underwent an OGTT during 26+0 to 29+6 weeks of gestation between January 2021 and June 2021 at the Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital. The gold standard pathway of universal second-trimester OGTT were compared with eight alternative pathways (which considered fasting glucose levels, a history of GDM, and/or any risk factors) in terms of the estimated percentage reduction in the number of OGTTs performed, sensitivity and specificity of detecting GDM, and estimated percentage of women with composite adverse outcomes (CAO).
Results: Of 769 women who underwent the OGTT, 96 (12.5%) had GDM. The need for an OGTT was reduced 100% in pathway 3, 87.1% in pathway 9, 84.9% in pathway 5, 80.8% in pathway 8, 78.5% in pathway 4, 46.3% in pathway 7, 41.4% in pathway 2, 4.8% in pathway 6, and 0% in pathway 1. Specificity was high (97% to 100%) for all pathways, as were negative predictive values (90% to 100%). However, sensitivity was low (20% to 59%) for all pathways, except for pathways 1 and 6 (100%). In all pathways, the estimated percentage of women with CAO was higher in true-positive groups than in false-negative groups.
Conclusion: In Chinese women, compared with the universal second-trimester OGTT, alternative pathways could reduce the number of OGTTs performed, but the detection rate of GDM was poor. Obstetricians should encourage pregnant women to undergo the OGTT to reduce maternal and neonatal complications, even in the event of pandemic. In situations when infection control measures are ineffective, pathway 3 can be considered because it detects the highest percentage of women with CAO and eliminates the need for OGTTs.
References
Sacks DA, Hadden DR, Maresh M, et al. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG Consensus Panel–recommended criteria: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:526-8.
Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: a World Health Organization Guideline. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;103:341-63.
Sweeting A, Wong J, Murphy HR, Ross GP. A clinical update on gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev 2022;43:763-93.
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guidance for maternal medicine services in the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Accessed 25 February 2024. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/nkpfvim5/2020-12-09-guidance-for-maternal-medicine-services-in-the-coronavirus-c.pdf.
Yamamoto JM, Donovan LE, Feig DS, Berger H. Temporary alternative screening strategy for gestational diabetes screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: the need for a middle ground. Can J Diabetes 2022;46:204-6.
Diagnostic testing for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the COVID-19 pandemic: antenatal and postnatal testing advice. Accessed 25 February 2024. Available from: https://www.adips.org/documents/RevisedGDMCOVID-19GuidelineFINAL30April2020pdf.pdf.
McIntyre HD, Gibbons KS, Ma RCW, et al. Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020;167:108353.
Nachtergaele C, Vicaut E, Tatulashvili S, et al. Limiting the use of oral glucose tolerance tests to screen for hyperglycemia in pregnancy during pandemics. J Clin Med 2021;10:397.
The Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Accessed 25 February 2024. Available from: https://www.hkcog.org.hk/hkcog/Download/Guidelines_on_GDM_updated.pdf.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. Accessed 25 February 2024. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e49-e64.
Fok TF, So HK, Wong E, et al. Updated gestational age specific birth weight, crown-heel length, and head circumference of Chinese newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F229-F236.
Spong CY, Beall M, Rodrigues D, Ross MG. An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:433-6.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder dystocia. Green-top Guideline No. 42. Accessed 25 February 2024. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/ewgpnmio/gtg_42.pdf.
Nguyen CL, Pham NM, Binns CW, Duong DV, Lee AH. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Eastern and Southeastern Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res 2018;2018:6536974.
Kasuga Y, Saisho Y, Ikenoue S, Ochiai D, Tanaka M. A new diagnostic strategy for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic for the Japanese population. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020;36:e3351.
CityU, HKUMed and Gleneagles Hospital Hong Kong join hands to introduce portable negative pressure ventilation system in hospital emergency room to reduce COVID-19 cross-infection risk. Accessed 25 February 2024. Available from: https://www.cityu.edu.hk/research/stories/2022/04/07/cityu-hkumed-and-gleneagles-hospital-hong-kong-join-hands-introduce-portable-negative-pressure-ventilation-system-hospital-emergency-room-reduce-covid-19-cross-infection-risk.
Lai Y, Chen H, Du Z, Zhou S, Xu W, Li T. The diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c in detecting gestational diabetes mellitus among Chinese pregnant individuals. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:1014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.