The Self-management versus nurse-led care of vaginal pessary in patients with pelvic organ prolapse
Keywords:
Nurse practitioners, Pelvic organ prolapse, Pessaries, Self careAbstract
Objectives: To compare the outcomes and complications of self-management and nurse-led care in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods: This retrospective study reviewed medical records of patients aged >18 years with a diagnosis of POP who used a ring vaginal pessary and attended at least two follow-up visits, with an interval of >3 months, at the outpatient urogynaecology POP nurse clinic of Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2023. Patients were assessed at each follow-up visit. Satisfaction with vaginal pessary use was
assessed using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100. Quality of life was assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20.
Results: In total, 812 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 343 were able to perform regular vaginal pessary self-management and 469 required nurse-led care. The two groups were comparable in terms of POP stage. Patients who performed self-management were younger at initiation of vaginal pessary (64.1 vs 70.0 years, p<0.001) and had fewer follow-up visits during the 3-year study period (3.83 vs 5.48, p<0.001). The proportion of patients with vaginal discharge was higher in the self-management group (43.4% vs 37.1%, p=0.068), but the proportion of patients with vaginal ulcers with deep tissue penetration and scarring or vaginal erosion on examination
was lower in the self-management group (6.4% vs 11.9%, p=0.008). Self-management and nurse-led care groups had comparable vaginal pessary satisfaction scores (74.05 vs 74.31, p=0.87) and showed significant improvements in QOL scores between first and last follow-up visits.
Conclusion: Vaginal pessary self-management can reduce healthcare service utilisation. Caregiver involvement in self-management may enhance adherence. Patients who performed self-management had a lower rate of vaginal ulcers on examination, which may increase the longevity of pessary use.
References
Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et.al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:165-94.
Brown HW, Hegde A, Huebner M, et al. International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs. Int Urogynecol J 2022;33:173-87.
Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Walters MD, Weber AM. Pelvic symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:982-8.
Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Bump AC, Addison WA. A survey of pessary use by members of the American Urogynecologic Society. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:931-5.
Manchana T, Bunyavejchevin S. Impact on quality of life after ring pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:873-7.
Mendes LC, Bezerra LRPS, Bilhar APM, et al. Symptomatic and anatomic improvement of pelvic organ prolapse in vaginal pessary users. Int Urogynecol J 2021;32:1023-9.
Mao M, Ai F, Zhang Y, et al. Changes in the symptoms and quality of life of women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse fitted with a ring with support pessary. Maturitas 2018;117:51-6.
Sansone S, Sze C, Eidelberg A, et al. Role of pessaries in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2022;140:613-22.
Kakkar A, Reuveni-Salzman A, Bentaleb J, Belzile E, Merovitz L, Larouche M. Adverse events associated with pessary use over one year among women attending a pessary care clinic. Int Urogynecol J 2023;34:1765-70.
Yimphong T, Temtanakitpaisan T, Buppasiri P, Chongsomchai C, Kanchaiyaphum S. Discontinuation rate and adverse events after 1 year of vaginal pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2018;29:1123-8.
Liang SJ, Chow PK, Chou SY, Hsu CS. Incarcerated vaginal pessary: a rare complication. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2004;43:149-50.
Dabic S, Sze C, Sansone S, Chughtai B. Rare complications of pessary use: a systematic review of case reports. BJUI Compass 2022;3:415-23.
Mohamed WI, Emmanuel D, Maqbool S, Asad A, Jawad A, Ihtesham A. Rectovaginal fistula due to an erosive pessary: a case report. Int J Med Stud 2022;9:304-6.
Moore KH, Lammers K, Allen W, Parkin K, Te West N. Does monthly self-management of vaginal ring pessaries reduce the rate of adverse events? A clinical audit. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2022;16:100164.
Stairs J, Gujral P, Ehlebracht A, van Diepen A, Clancy AA. Women’s attitudes towards pessary self-care: a qualitative study. Int Urogynecol J 2023;34:1899-906.
Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:103-13.
Ma Y, Xu T, Zhang Y, Mao M, Kang J, Zhu L. Validation of the Chinese version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) according to the COSMIN checklist. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:1127-39.
Zhu L, Yu S, Xu T, et al. Chinese validation of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form. Menopause 2011;18:1030-3.
Ruffolo AF, Lallemant M, Aurore D, Kerbage Y, Rubod C, Cosson M. Self-care of vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024;309:2367-80.
Kearney R, Brown C. Self-management of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2014;3:u206180.w2533.
Cheng WT, Lau CHS, Cheung YKR, Chan SCS. Selfmanagement of pessary in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery 2025;25:33-6.
Lau SCH, Chan WL, Cheng WT, Cheung RYK, Chan SSC. The success rate of Hong Kong Chinese women with pelvic organ prolapse in pessary self-management: a multi-centered prospective study [Epub ahead of print]. Int Urogynecol J 2026.
Cheung RY, Lee JH, Lee LL, Chung TK, Chan SS. Vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:73-80.
Bugge C, Dembinsky M, Khunda A, et al. Self-management of vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse: multi-method process evaluation, linked to the TOPSY randomised controlled trial. BMC Med 2025;24:19.
Lamers BH, Broekman BM, Milani AL. Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life: a review. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:637-44.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.
