Evaluation of Recurrent Postmenopausal Bleeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.12.1.126Abstract
Objectives: This study was undertaken to examine the prevalence and predictors of endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia in women with recurrent postmenopausal bleeding after an initial negative assessment.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1931 women who had investigations in our Postmenopausal Bleeding Clinic for single or recurrent postmenopausal bleeding from 1 September 2007 to 30 June 2011. Their basic characteristics, the causes of bleeding, and time of recurrence were analysed.
Results: In women with postmenopausal bleeding for the first time, the prevalence of endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia were 3.1% and 1.2%, respectively. After initial negative assessment, 262 (10.6%) women had recurrent postmenopausal bleeding. Among them, 5 (1.9%) turned out to have endometrial cancer, 4 (1.5%) had endometrial hyperplasia, and 1 (0.4%) had cervical cancer. The time interval between the initial negative assessment and the final diagnosis of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia ranged from 6 to 73 months with a median of 17 months. Women with endometrial thickness of more than 4 mm at the initial assessment were more likely to have endometrial cancer or hyperplasia if they experienced recurrent postmenopausal bleeding (odds ratio=10.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-51.8; p=0.003) when compared to those with less endometrial thickness. The greater the endometrial thickness (>5 mm) at the initial assessment, the higher was the risk (odds ratio=13.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.0-60.7; p=0.001). Women with initial histopathology showing proliferative or secretory endometrium were also more likely to have endometrial cancer or hyperplasia when they experienced recurrent postmenopausal bleeding (odds ratio=7.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-32.4; p=0.021) than those with other histopathology (including insufficient sample, atrophic endometrium, endometrial polyp and pyometra). A case of suboptimal hysteroscopic examination with insufficient tissue from endometrial biopsy for histopathological diagnosis with increased endometrial thickness
had endometrial cancer diagnosed 6 months after the initial ‘negative’ assessment.
Conclusion: Women with recurrent postmenopausal bleeding after initial negative assessment should be reinvestigated because they still have the risk of significant genital tract malignancy. Those with endometrial thickness of more than 4 mm or a proliferative or secretory endometrium at the initial assessment are especially at risk. Whenever a woman presents with postmenopausal bleeding and increased endometrial thickness but the hysteroscopic assessment is suboptimal and there is insufficient tissue for diagnosis from the endometrial biopsy, a more thorough examination and specific management should be considered.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.