Accuracy of Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Weight by Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents and Maternal-fetal Medicine Subspecialists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.13.1.136Abstract
Objectives: This study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of sonographic estimations of fetal weight performed by maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists and obstetrics and gynaecology residents. Methods: Retrospective data were retrieved between May and December 2011 for all women with ingleton pregnancies of more than 24 weeks who had an ultrasound examination within 1 week of delivery. Sonographic parameters including the bi-parietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and emur length were measured according to the established criteria, and referred to the revised reference harts of fetal biometry. The estimated fetal weights were calculated using the Hadlock formula and compared with the infants’ actual birth weights by using statistical analysis.
Results: The mean absolute errors ± standard deviation of ultrasound fetal weight estimations performed by maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists and obstetrics and gynaecology residents were 5.89% ± 5.10% and 7.77% ± 5.72%, respectively (p=0.03). The percentage of correctly estimated fetal eights (defined as <10% difference from the actual birth weight) was significantly different between the maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists and obstetrics and gynaecology residents at 79.3% and 65.4%, espectively (p=0.01).
Conclusion: The accuracy demonstrated by the obstetrics and gynaecology residents was comparable to some of the published studies. The maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists performed better in sonographic estimation of fetal weight than did the obstetrics and gynaecology residents. However, one in five of the estimates made by the maternal-fetal medicine subspecialists was more than 10% difference from the actual birth weight of the infant.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.