Outcome of 555 Consecutive Transabdominal Chorionic Villus Samplings in a Teaching Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.1.1.3Abstract
The objective of this study was to review the outcome of 555 consecutive transabdominal chorionic villus samplings (CVS) for prenatal chromosomal or genetic studies. All procedures were performed by trained operators under continuous ultrasound guidance. The commonest indications for the procedure were advanced maternal age (91.7%), previous history of chromosomal abnormalities (3.8%) and thalassaemia couples (2.5%). The majority of procedures (99.3%) were performed between 11 and 13 weeks of gestation. The procedure was successful in retrieving adequate amount of placental tissue for genetic studies in 551 cases (99.28%) and correct placement of needle was achieved in the first attempt in 97.8% of cases. Of the 548 chromosomal studies, 22 abnormalities were detected (4.0%), including 2 cases (0.36%) of confined placental mosaicism. A further 5 cases of major thalassaemia were diagnosed. Confined placental mosaicism which necessitated subsequent amniocentesis was only 0.36%. Eighteen cases resulted in pregnancy termination. There were 10 cases (1.8%) of unintended fetal loss after procedure, of which 7 (1.26%) were potentially procedure-related. The risks of fetal loss were 0% within 4 weeks of procedure, 0.36% within 6 week and 0.72% within 10 weeks. Since some of these fetal losses would be part of the background fetal wastage, the risk of procedure-related fetal loss after CVS was probably much lower than 1%. We concluded that CVS is an accurate and safe prenatal diagnostic test that should be available for women being counselled for prenatal diagnosis. (HKJGOM 2000; 1:21-27)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.