Use of intrapartum ultrasound before assisted vaginal delivery in a single hospital in Hong Kong
Keywords:
Extraction, obstetrical, Labor stage, second, UltrasonographyAbstract
Objectives: To investigate the use of intrapartum ultrasound (ITU) under different indications for assisted vaginal delivery, as well as the frequencies of assessment of various ITU parameters, by clinicians in a single hospital.
Methods: Medical records of women who underwent assisted vaginal delivery at Kwong Wah Hospital between 3 January 2023 and 2 January 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Seven ITU parameters were recorded: spine position, head position, angle of progression (AoP), head-perineum distance (HPD), head direction, asynclitism, and size of caput succedaneum.
Results: In total, 113 assisted vaginal deliveries were included in the analysis, comprising ventouse extraction (n=94), forceps delivery (n=17), and sequential instrumental birth (n=2). There were no failed assisted vaginal deliveries. Of the 113 assisted vaginal deliveries, 70 (61.9%) had prior ITU for indications of prolonged second stage (n=46), fetal distress (n=20), and maternal medical conditions (n=4); the respective ITU use rates were 92.0%, 35.7%, and 57.1% (p<0.001]). Among the 70 assisted vaginal deliveries with prior ITU, 29 (41.4%) had all seven sonographic parameters assessed before making the decision for assisted vaginal delivery. HPD and AoP were assessed in all cases, followed by spine position (92.9%), size of caput succedaneum (80.0%), asynclitism (78.6%), head position (62.9%), and head direction (42.9%). The frequencies of assessment among parameters differed significantly (p<0.001). Asynclitism and size of caput succedaneum were assessed least frequently than head and spine position, as well as station and descent (as measured by HPD, AoP, or head direction).
Conclusion: The rate of using ITU to assess labour progress prior to assisted vaginal delivery for prolonged second stage was high at our hospital under the opt-out protocol. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine position and head station (via HPD and AoP) were most commonly assessed. The opt-out protocol may encourage ITU use, particularly in cases of delayed second stage, while preserving clinicians’ independent judgement.
References
1. Murphy DJ, Strachan BK, Bahl R; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Assisted Vaginal Birth: Green-top Guideline No. 26. BJOG 2020;127:e70-e112.
2. Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52:128-39.
3. Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, et al. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG 2014;121:1029-38.
4. Skinner SM, Neil P, Hodges RJ, Murray NM, Mol BW, Rolnik DL. The use of intrapartum ultrasound in operative vaginal birth: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024;6:101345.
5. Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:326-30.
6. Bultez T, Quibel T, Bouhanna P, Popowski T, Resche-Rigon M, Rozenberg P. Angle of fetal head progression measured using transperineal ultrasound as a predictive factor of vacuum extraction failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:86-91.
7. Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:69.e1-69.e10.
8. Kasbaoui S, Séverac F, Aïssi G, et al. Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:507.e1-507.e9.
9. Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG 2011;118:62-9.
10. Chan VYT, Lau WL. Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021;3(6S):100439.
11. Wiafe YA, Whitehead B, Venables H, Dassah ET. Acceptability of intrapartum ultrasound by mothers in an African population. J Ultrasound 2020;23:55-9.
12. Chan YT, Ng KS, Yung WK, Lo TK, Lau WL, Leung WC. Is intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination painless? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:3276-80.
13. Malvasi A, Damiani GR, DI Naro E, et al. Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: a study with informed consent and questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2023;20:100246.
14. Youssef A, Ghi T, Awad EE, et al. Ultrasound in labor: a caregiver's perspective. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:469-70.
15. Chan YT, Ng VK, Yung WK, Lo TK, Leung WC, Lau WL. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28:1476-81.
16. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, et al. Failed operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1017-22.
17. Tutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebø TM. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:425-9.
18. Falcone V, Dall'Asta A, Romano A, et al. Vacuum extraction is successful in 95% of cases with an occiput posterior position: the results of a prospective, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024:S0002-9378(24)01200-6.
19. Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:915-20.
20. Blasi I, D'Amico R, Fenu V, et al. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:210-5.
21. Tang GPY, Chan VYT, Ng VKS, Lau WL, Leung WC. Can intrapartum ultrasound assessment of fetal spine and head position predict persistent occiput posterior position at delivery? Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery 2016;1:102-7.
22. Ali UA, Norwitz ER. Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;2:5-17.
23. Hung CMW, Chan VYT, Ghi T, Lau W. Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021;3:100437.
24. Romano A, Zeevi G, Navon I, Rak L, Bercovich O, Gilboa Y. Caput succedaneum sonographic evaluation prior to vacuum extraction delivery: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023;228(Suppl):S96.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.
