Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of ethnic minorities in a public hospital in Hong Kong: a retrospective matched cohort pilot study
Keywords:
Ethnic and racial minorities, Pre-eclampsia, Pregnancy outcomeAbstract
Objectives: To evaluate the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of ethnic minorities at a public hospital in Hong Kong.
Methods: Medical records of non-Chinese women (excluding Western women) who had singleton pregnancies and delivered at ≥24 gestational weeks between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2023 at Kwong Wah Hospital were retrieved, as were records of Chinese women matched for parity and maternal age with the closest delivery dates. The two groups were compared, and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine independent factors associated with adverse outcomes.
Results: In total, 218 ethnic minority women and 218 matched Chinese women were included. Non-Chinese women were more often unbooked, had higher body mass index, had lower haemoglobin levels at booking visits, and were more likely to have chronic hypertension and preeclampsia. However, non-Chinese women had lower intrapartum blood loss and a lower incidence of postpartum haemorrhage but higher rates of overall and emergency lower-segment Caesarean section. Non-Chinese women were more likely to undergo Caesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion or lack of progress, failed induction, and hypertensive disorders. A trend towards higher neonatal intensive care unit admission rates was observed among non-Chinese women.
Conclusion: Compared with Chinese women, non-Chinese women had higher rates of unbooked antenatal care, preeclampsia, and Caesarean section, as well as lower haemoglobin levels at booking visits, but lower rates of postpartum haemorrhage. Early recognition and close monitoring of risk factors are particularly important for ethnic minority women.
References
1. Race Relations Unit, Home Affairs Department, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The Demographics: Ethnic Groups. Accessed 26 May 2025. Available from: https://www.had.gov.hk/rru/english/info/demographics.htm.
2. Study on Discrimination against Ethnic Minorities in the Provision of Goods, Services and Facilities, and Disposal and Management of Premises. Accessed 26 May 2025. Available from: https://www.eoc.org.hk/EOC/Upload/UserFiles/File/ResearchReport/201609/EM-GSF_Report(Eng)V8_2_final.pdf.
3. World Health Organization. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Accessed 26 May 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241500852.
4. MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care 2024 - Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2020-22. Accessed 26 May 2025. Available from: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/assets/downloads/mbrrace-uk/reports/maternal-report-2024/MBRRACE-UK%20Maternal%20MAIN%20Report%202024%20V2.0%20ONLINE.pdf.
5. Howell EA. Reducing disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2018;61:387-99.
6. Loftin R, Chen A, Evans A, DeFranco E. Racial differences in gestational age-specific neonatal morbidity: further evidence for different gestational lengths. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:259.e1-6.
7. Parchem JG, Rice MM, Grobman WA, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes at term. Am J Perinatol 2023;40:557-66.
8. Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Aagaard K. Pregnancy outcomes among Hispanics stratified by country of origin. Am J Perinatol 2021;38:497-506.
9. Quality Assurance Subcommittee, Coordinating Committee (Obstetrics & Gynaecology), Hospital Authority. Annual obstetric report on all hospitals under the Hospital Authority.
10. Jardine J, Walker K, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes attributable to socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in England: a national cohort study. Lancet 2021;398:1905-12.
11. Minopoli M, Noël L, Dagge A, Blayney G, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Maternal ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation: influence on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024;64:187-92.
12. Leung SY, Ku HB. Cross-border healthcare-seeking and utilization behaviours among ethnic minorities: exploring the nexus of the perceived better option and public health concerns. BMC Public Health 2024;24:1497.
13. Magee LA, Nicolaides KH, von Dadelszen P. Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1817-32.
14. Bilano VL, Ota E, Ganchimeg T, Mori R, Souza JP. Risk factors of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its adverse outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a WHO secondary analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e91198.
15. Xiao J, Shen F, Xue Q, et al. Is ethnicity a risk factor for developing preeclampsia? An analysis of the prevalence of preeclampsia in China. J Hum Hypertens 2014;28:694-8.
16. Rao AK, Daniels K, El-Sayed YY, Moshesh MK, Caughey AB. Perinatal outcomes among Asian American and Pacific Islander women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:834-8.
17. Moungmaithong S, Wang X, Tai AST, et al. First trimester screening for preeclampsia: an Asian perspective. Matern Fetal Med 2021;3:116-23.
18. Betti L. Shaping birth: variation in the birth canal and the importance of inclusive obstetric care. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2021;376:20200024.
19. Yunas I, Islam MA, Sindhu KN, et al. Causes of and risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2025;405:1468-80.
20. Cho H, Kang J, Kim HS, Park KW. Ethnic differences in oral antithrombotic therapy. Korean Circ J 2020;50:645-57.
21. Li S, Gao J, Liu J, et al. Incidence and risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage in China: a multicenter retrospective study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:673500.
22. Hospital Authority. Existing and planned measures on the promotion of racial equality. Accessed 26 May 2025. Available from: https://www.ha.org.hk/haho/ho/bssd_o/ExistingAndPlannedMeasuresEng.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal has a fully Open Access policy and publishes all articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. For any use other than that permitted by this license, written permission must be obtained from the Journal.